Bridges to Cope with Global Realities
(IDN) - Canada is a nation of immigrants and diasporas. A generation
ago, the overwhelmingly percentage of immigrants to Canada were American
or European. In 1967, Canada also adopted a "points system"
for immigrants. Four years later, Canada was the first country to
officially adopt a policy of multiculturalism. These two changes laid
the basis for a radical change in who became Canadian citizens. Now,
Of a population of 34 million Canadians, more than 1.3 million are of
Chinese origin and 1.3 million are south Asian (mostly Indian), with the
majority in Toronto and Vancouver, with the largest single group from
the Punjab. Apart from English and French, the most widely spoken
languages are Chinese, Italian and Punjabi, which is now even used for
broadcasts of that most Canadian of games, hockey.
Despite these impressive numbers, the study of diasporas in this country
is in its infancy. When I became president and CEO of the former
Canadian Institute of International Affairs in 2004, only 7 years ago, I
was told that diaspora studies were too politically sensitive to touch.
Fortunately, that has changed.
However, Canada still has yet to figure out how exactly to leverage its
large Indo-Canadian diaspora.
Canada does have advantages in its relationship with India that goes
beyond its large diaspora. The two countries share the use of the
English language, both are open societies, and both are Parliamentary
democracies. Canada and India share a common British heritage, with the
advantage that Canada was never a colonizing power. Indo-Canadians are
becoming more prominent, particularly in politics.
And after decades of impaired relations because of disagreement over the
nuclear issue, relations are finally on a firm footing. Canada and India
have completed a Nuclear Cooperation Agreement and are negotiating a
Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement or CEPA.
If truth be told, India has become a favoured partner to some
politicians precisely because it is not China, and does not have China's
baggage on issues such as human rights, the Dalai Lama, Taiwan and an
aggressive policy in the South China Sea. And it seems easier to
translate Indo-Canadians into votes than Canadians of Chinese ancestry.
Unfortunately, it is not going to be easy to get young people to
function as bridges to India.
First, a major 2008 study by Kant Bhargava and JC Sharma entitled
'Building Bridges: A Case Study on the Role of the Indian Diaspora in
Canada' concludes that the diaspora's record in strengthening
Canada-India relations has been poor.
Second, Canadian public opinion is a problem, as polling numbers clearly
show. The Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada released its National
Opinion Poll on Canadians' views on Asia in mid-April, and the results
Canadians' feelings towards Asian countries are decidedly cool. Only 9%
viewed China warmly and only 12% viewed India positively. It's not clear
why in the case of India. As for China, it is probably the result of the
fact that most of the news we hear about China is negative, whether it
is because of the issues mentioned above or stories about poisonous toys
or dubious food products.
Only 1 in 4 of those interviewed saw Canada as part of the Asia Pacific
region, and that percentage has been in decline.
Only 16% of Canadians see India as important to Canada's prosperity, and
that number is also in decline.
There are a few rays of hope, however. The attitudes towards India were
more favourable than those towards China; younger Canadians responded
more positively to these questions; and India's growing economic power
is seen as more of an opportunity than a threat.
In a separate Asia Pacific Foundation poll of Asia practitioners,
including Indo-Canadians, 87% of respondents said India is an Asian
country the Canadian government should give priority to, second only to
China at 95%.
Finally – and this is germane to bridge building between Canada and
India – when asked what priority Ottawa should give to specific
actions in 2011, at the top of the list was: "Work with provincial
governments to develop or strengthen education linkages."
Not far behind was "promote public education policy that puts
greater emphasis on teaching about Asia and Asian languages," and
finally, "Strengthen human ties with Asia by facilitating mobility
(of) citizens/landed immigrants across the Pacific through, for example,
visa requirements and expanded air services."
So there is hope, and closer educational ties need to be a part of it.
How should we proceed?
There has been a huge amount of attention paid to the economic benefits
of getting Indian and other foreign students to study in Canada. The
benefits to Canada are usually thought to run in the tens of thousands
of dollars. And of course there is the unmeasurable benefit that
students who study in another country almost always turn into goodwill
ambassadors of that country and help to build bridges, then or later on
in their careers.
Canada has not done well, here, however. The number of Indian students
that study in the U.S., Britain or Australia is vastly higher than it is
here, as University of Waterloo professor Ryan Touhey has shown.
Still, the numbers are improving. Thanks in large part to Canada's High
Commissioner to India Stewart Beck, it has become much easier for Indian
students to get visas. Last year, the numbers increased to 14,000 from a
few thousand, and High Commissioner Beck is keen to get that number
much, much higher.
I would argue, however, that if we really want to build lasting bridges
the flow has to be two-way. That means Canadian students and faculty
going to India, and more Canadian institutions either setting up shop in
India or establishing partnerships with Indian institutions.
We have some distance to go. Lia Cosco, recently a postgraduate research
fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation (APF Canada), has just published a
study on Canadian overseas and international Schools. Cosco makes the
point that: "The bond between foreign students and Canadian
education will significantly impact the future of Canada’s
people-to-people ties with Asia." While Canada has 70 such schools,
including 40 in China alone, there is only one Canadian international
school in India.
Still, there has been progress. The Schulich School of Business at York
University in Toronto has just graduated its first MBAs in India and is
building a campus in Hyderabad.
On June 8, the University of Waterloo, the Canada India Foundation and
the Asia Pacific Foundation launched the Chanchlani India Policy Centre
at the University of Waterloo, leveraging a generous gift from Vasu
Chanchlani, an Indo-Canadian entrepreneur and philanthropist.
The goal of the Centre is to provide policy-relevant research in Canada
and in India on the most timely issues in the Canada-India relationship.
A "mapping session" of 40 experts from across the country on
June 8 made clear that building bridges and engaging youth will be one
of the major themes of our research.
Of course there is more to education than exchanges. What we really need
across North America and the Caribbean is more emphasis on Asia-relevant
material in our mainstream curricula. How can you attract foreign
students in general and Indian students in particular when you don’t
tell their stories?
We need a global classroom.
A few decades ago when I went to school in Peterborough, Ontario, world
history as presented was painfully and shamefully parochial. It was the
history of Europe and North America, and in particular of every British
King, Queen, Princess and war since the Magna Carta. China got a few
paragraphs for the invention of gunpowder and the travels of Marco Polo,
an Italian; India a few pages largely because it had the Taj Mahal and
was an outpost of the Empire; and Japan because Admiral Perry, an
American, opened the country to the outside. So most of what little we
learned about Asia was thanks to the intervention of – and through the
eyes of – westerners.
LONG WAY AHEAD
From what I understand, the balance is improving but still has a long
way to go.
That's why APF Canada has launched what we call the National
Conversation on Asia, a multi-year, civil society led initiative to help
put Asia on the radar screens of Canadians and to prepare us for a
century in which the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China), and
particularly India and China, are increasingly going to dominate.
The National Conversation has a number of programs specifically to
engage youth, such as blogs written by young Canadians living here or in
Asia; regional youth conferences; and networking events designed to help
young graduates with interest in Asia move forward with their careers.
The world is changing quickly, and we had all better be ready for it.
Building bridges and engaging youth are important steps towards coming
to terms with the global realities of the 21st century.
Douglas Goold is the Toronto-based Director of the National
Conversation on Asia, a multi-year initiative of the Asia Pacific
Foundation of Canada. Dr. Goold is the former President of the Canadian
International Council (CIC) and former Editor of The Globe and Mail's
Report on Business. As a CIC Senior Fellow he completed a highly
regarded study on Canadian companies that do business in India. Goold
has a PhD in modern history from Cambridge (UK).
This article is based on the writer's speech at the PBD CANADA 2011
(Pravasi Bharatiya Divas, 'The Day of Overseas Indians'), Toronto, June