|
INTERNET AND NEW MEDIA |
|
|
|
One:
Fear of rejection and lack of support by the Internet practitioners and the
domain registrar community of the world, who for some strange reason have not
expressed their full and open support, partially due to serious lack of
understanding of the global business nomenclature and also for real
complexities of cyber-branding.Historically speaking the original
concept of the first five suffixes, like com or net, most probably drawn up at
the back of a napkin, have proven one thing, that till now .com is the king
and all the others suffixes are in a struggle. So,
suddenly the unlimited issuance of suffixes of choice is a shocker. Internet
registrars in a suffix driven registration mentality are quite right as their
existing suffixes will seriously shrink. However, based on soon to be released
study by ABC Namebank, which points to the law of usability which dictates
that these new domains are not about suffixes, rather these are domain names
without suffixes. The future is all about name driven domain identities over
suffix driven domain identities and the lack of corporate nomenclature
understanding at a global scale is the proof. Imagine a city phone book and
yellow pages under a suffix system. 100 phone books anyone? The
study also points to the numbers of new applications under the new platform to
be so large all over the world that it will totally re-energize the entire
Internet support services due new sets of domain name management and varied
registrations requirements. Two:
Lack of credibility and confusion among the trademark professionals and
attorneys worldwide who are aggressively exploring their particular role in
the process but still keep pointing out serious risks to trademark holders and
of increased cyber squatting. The
trademark profession justifiably recognizes three critical issues, firstly,
the availability, suitability and registrability of any proposed name
application under the common law, allowing traditional trademark process which
provides progressive jurisdictional approval over years and now its sudden
correlation to a new process of global cyber name branding in one single
stroke. Secondly, the court challenges between newly recognized cyber brands
and traditionally filed brands and lastly, the serious limitations on already
approved trademarked names filed in regions in their own classification which
would only fail on this single classification new platform where only one
single name would be allowed to exist. The
study by ABC Namebank clearly points to a serious 95% dilution factor among
major business names around the world and how this cyber branding race will
create havoc among those aggressively filed but poorly crafted brand names. Despite,
all the weird and mysterious reasons, the fact remains that most medium and
large size business names all over the world are badly structured and cannot
pass the global test on this new platform and the exposure of this blunt fact
should not be one of the prime reason of opposition, rather it only creates a
great opportunity as a fix for real global image expansion. Irrespective of
all this it will be a real big bang era for trademark and legal professions as
they are poised to play a very big role. Three:
Complete absence of any enthusiastic support from the advertising and
marketing trade, this group is not only oblivious to this tsunami but due to
the technical ramification finds it at odds to even mention it. The
marketing professionals, the branding experts and the advertising agencies,
encompassing a couple of million people in this trade worldwide have yet to
discover, what this revolutionary device can deliver at a global scale at a
price less than the production cost of a single TV commercial. The massive
shrinkage due to digitization of the global advertising and branding industry
already underway will eventually get harmonized with these new cyber
platforms. For now, some fast track education is needed to capture and
re-energize the entire industry, the sheer volume of the re-branding;
re-naming and the re-positioning will also open extraordinary new fronts. Four:
Outright rejection by the domain name protection agencies, as their extra
filings of millions of domain names to scare off cyber squatters as a service
may be considered redundant. The
ease of entry to a domain name purchase really spread the disease of
cyber-squatting but now with a proposed price tag of $200K-500K for each name,
plus a rigorous complex process, the midnight trains of mysterious squatters
would simply be shunted to other tracks. Furthermore, once a new gtld domain
is allotted to a party, it would be very naïve to assume that ICANN would
allow several modified versions of the same name to be sold to others. The
brand protection agencies will have far too many other new fronts to explore
and they may have to out focus form only squatting. Five:
Lack of a powerful message for the global entrepreneurial audience and for not
being able to articulate the issues with swift speed, utilizing the latest
technologies of mass communication and making this a popular high level global
business debate. The
mother of all action is this arena, where brand new ideas will incubate and
dynamics of the new platform will shine. With a billion additional users
coming on the surface the endless horizon will change and global interaction
will create a very rich Internet experience. Media has paid little attention
to this subject as this item is still in the IT columns of the lukewarm
publications and has yet to make a front page breaking news when for example,
Paris Hilton, would throw a tantrum and demand her exclusive global rights to
both of the new global domain names dot paris and dot hilton etc. at any price
or else. Are we really waiting for the Paris’s parade of the paparazzi? More
information on the size and magnitude of these important issues can be found
on www.icann.org or on Google by searching
“the billion dollar domain babies” or “new gtld” Conclusion: The
world’s business community needs a quick educational pill so that the
techno-babble would seriously clash with the sing-song-slogans, creating a
clear and a very rich message that will not only add the value and power to
this new platform but also bring it to the center stage. For
now, should ICANN drop the idea? no, never,
but if it did, nothing really will change for a while, but sooner or
later, somehow a group of new countries would claim the true ownership of the
Internet and set up a global body to meet the worldly challenges of tomorrow.
While the above mentioned fears may have overtaken, right now, the global
business community critically needs an easy global access and quick market
expansion to survive and this platform offers some key solutions and for that
reason alone and without delay the future must meet today. Fire-up all the engines, ICANN. ________________ [Naseem Javed is a widely recognized world-authority on corporate nomenclature and global image issues. Author of Naming for Power, Naseem founded ABC Namebank some 30 years ago in Toronto and New York, and introduced The Laws of Corporate Naming, a quarter century ago. He is currently is lecturing on global cyber branding and the new ICANN platform. His website is: www.abcnamebank.com. He can be reached @ nj@njabc.com .] |
Copyright
© Globalom Media 2001-2009