June 2008

Vol 7 - No. 12
 

  ABOUT US CONTACT FEEDBACK WEATHER BACK ISSUES ADVERTISE

 

HOME

 

BREAKING NEWS

 

VIEWS

 

THE COMMUNITY

 

LIFESTYLE

 

WELLNESS

 

ADVICE

 

MIND & SPIRIT

 

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

 

SEARCH

LINKS

 


Migration | June 2008

 


______________________________________________________________________________

Immigrants in the Hinterlands

Canadian Immigrant Labour Market: 2006
Analysis by region or country of birth


Immigrants born in Southeast Asia, particularly those from the Philippines, had the strongest labour market performance of all immigrants to Canada in 2006, regardless of when they landed in the country. The study assessed the labour force situation for immigrants at three stages: very recent immigrants, who had landed between 2001 and 2006; recent immigrants, who had landed between 1996 and 2001; and established immigrants, who had been in Canada more than 10 years.

The study found that in 2006, many very recent immigrants in the core working-age group (aged 25 to 54), regardless of their region of birth, had experienced more difficulties in the labour market than the Canadian born. Among very recent immigrants, only those born in Southeast Asia had unemployment rates, employment rates and participation rates that were more or less on par with the core working-age Canadian-born population. Those born elsewhere in Asia (including the Middle East) as well as individuals born in Latin America, Europe and Africa all had higher unemployment rates and lower employment rates in 2006 than their Canadian-born counterparts.

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Asian-born immigrants largest group to settle in Canada

Regardless of period of landing, people born in Asia (including the Middle East) were the largest group of immigrants that had settled in Canada as of 2006. Many were born in the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Philippines, Iran or Pakistan. For all Asians aged 25 to 54, their employment rate was much weaker than that of the Canadian born, especially among very recent immigrants. Their employment rate was only 63.8%, compared with 83.1% for their counterparts born in Canada.

  • Immigrants born in Europe

Despite being a declining proportion of immigrants aged 25 to 54, those born in Europe still represented the second-largest source region of all immigrants in 2006. Many came from the United Kingdom, Italy, Poland, Portugal or Romania. As with most other regions, very recent immigrants born in Europe had a higher unemployment rate than the Canadian born. Their unemployment rate was 8.4%, above the average rate of 4.9% for people born in Canada.

  • Immigrants born in Latin America

As with almost all other regions, very recent immigrants of core working age born in Latin America had higher unemployment rates and lower employment rates in 2006 than did the Canadian born.

  • Immigrants born in Africa

No matter what period they had landed, immigrants of core working age who were born in Africa had higher unemployment rates and lower employment rates compared with the Canadian born and with immigrants born in some other regions.

  • Immigrant men more likely to be working than immigrant women

In general, immigrant men of core working age were more likely than their female counterparts to be participating in the Canadian labour market.

  • Young very recent immigrants had high unemployment rates

Young very recent immigrants aged 15 to 24 had unemployment rates in 2006 that were higher and employment rates that were lower than their Canadian-born counterparts, no matter in which region they were born.

  • Most older immigrants were born in Europe, Asia

The study also examined older workers. In 2006, Canada had about 2.1 million immigrants aged 55 and over, the vast majority of whom (93%) were established immigrants. In fact, most had landed in Canada before 1986. Most of these older immigrants were born in two regions: Europe (59%) or Asia (25%).



Study: Immigrants in the hinterlands 1992 to 2005

By André Bernard


SUMMARY  

The distribution of the immigrant population in the urban and rural areas differs vastly from the rest of the population. While approximately 34% of Canadians 20 years of age or older live in one of the three largest urban centres (Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver), nearly 75% of immigrants live there. On the other hand, while a little more than one in five Canadians lives in a small city or rural area with a population under 15,000, barely one in forty immigrants lives there.

For most Canadians, living in a large metropolitan area is usually synonymous with having a higher income. This trend is the opposite for immigrants. Immigrants' incomes are lowest (median of $16,800) in very large urban areas and their incomes are highest ($19,500) in small urban areas, a difference of 16%.

The initial income gap between immigrants and the rest of the population is 37% for those living in very large urban areas. This gap decreases gradually and rather slowly. This gap falls under the 10% mark as of the twelfth year. On the other hand, in small urban areas, the initial gap is only 14%, and as of the fourth year, the gap is reversed, with the income of immigrants becoming 2% greater.

The income gap was widest upon an immigrant's arrival. It declined over time as individuals overcame such hurdles as lack of ability in official languages, unrecognized foreign qualifications, and lack of information on labour market requirements and employment opportunities. On average, however, immigrants living in large urban centres experienced a slow decline in this income gap. More vulnerable immigrant groups such as refugees, immigrants with no prior ability in an official language or immigrants with no more than a high school education also experienced more rapid economic integration in small urban centres and rural areas.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Immigrants living in small urban centres and in rural areas tend to achieve economic integration much faster than immigrants living in large urban areas.

  • The income gap between immigrants and Canadians living in similar areas closed faster over time in smaller centres and rural areas than in large cities.

  • The income advantage of immigrants was even more pronounced in small towns and rural areas, where the average income of immigrants was 4% higher than that of Canadians.

  • Although refugees represented only 5% of immigrants in small towns and rural areas, they integrated very rapidly.

  • In contrast, refugees in very large urban areas earned 43% less and, after 13 years of residence, the gap was about 20%.

  • Only immigrants from the United States (and to a lesser degree from Oceania) integrated more quickly in larger centres than in smaller ones.

  • All other immigrants, especially those from Asia, integrated more rapidly (in economic terms) in smaller cities. 

[ Source: Statistics Canada]

Award-winning

Copyright © Globalom Media 2008
Publisher and Managing Editor: Suresh Jaura
Hosted and webdesigned by Globalom Media